Censorship, Global Trade and IP, IPR enforcement, Russia, Technology, Wikipedia Blackout

From Russia, Without Love (and Censorship)

About 7 months ago, English Wikipedia held a worldwide blackout on January 18, 2012, along with dozens of other Internet sites, to protest the internet bills of Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Protect IP Act (PIPA). And the move worked pretty well, since the bills are currently stalled, though bits and pieces of them seem to keep popping up elsewhere. Read the full details of the event here. The blackout actions have since been deemed a success.

On July 9, 2012, the Russian Wikipedia followed the example of its English counterpart, by shutting down for a full 24 hours to protest the new censorship law that has been introduced in the country. The protest is aimed mainly at the tremendous power that will be granted to the Russian government. By allowing it to blacklist certain categories of sites such as child pornography and substance abuse, the censorship bill does aim to play a positive role in criminal enforcement, but the concern for protest stems from the fact that the government’s censorship power can just as easily be misused to supress dissenting and critical voices. The worry then, is that Russia’s already stringent freedom of expression laws will be further used to quell opinions that are unpopular with the government’s view.

Interestingly, this is the second time this year that Wikipedia has chosen to get involved in online protesting and activism, very clearly showing its alliance and allegiance in the great IP rights, censorship and democratic governance debates. However, by assuming this role, it is also arguably losing its neutrality, something that it has always prided itself on. Watch founder Jimmy Wales’ defense of the decision to black Russian Wikipedia out, and his insistence that the organization remains committed to its primary goal of being an online encyclopedia.

As the interview goes on, however, Wales can’t help but justify the Russian blackout decision as an ‘of the people, for the people, by the people’ (quotes mine) sort of thing. Clearly though, even Wales is aware of the huge risk Wikipedia is taking. It remains to be seen whether the organization will still manage to maintain its neutrality, or if it might need to reevaluate its purpose online.


About Mekhala Chaubal

- J.D. Osgoode Hall Law School, Canada; Called to the Ontario Bar (2016) - Co-founder and blogger, IPEye: A blog on intellectual property issues in the emerging world. Check us out! www.ipeyeblog.com


No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

The Tweeting Eye: Follow us on Twitter

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

%d bloggers like this: